Abdominal Pain in Children (2024)

by Prassana Nadarajah

You have a new patient!

An 18-month-old boy is brought to the emergency department (ED) by his parents due to lethargy that has persisted for the last few hours. He is a term-born child with no significant antenatal history or pre-existing medical conditions. The child had been well until five days ago when he experienced a case of viral gastroenteritis. His feeding and urine output were adequate until about three hours ago, after which he began experiencing progressive episodes of crying, accompanied by vomiting and abdominal distension. There was no diarrhea or dark-colored stools noted.

a-photo-of-a-1-and-a-half-year-old-boy-(the image was produced by using ideogram 2.0)

During the triage assessment, the child appeared unsettled but was afebrile, with other vital signs within age-appropriate ranges. There were no rashes observed on his body, and there were no blood-stained stools in his diaper.

What do you need to know?

Importance

Abdominal pain is a common reason for children to present to the Emergency Department (ED) and represents up to 5% of all presentations in some institutions [1]. The most common causes are non-surgical, and at times it may be difficult to arrive at a specific diagnosis before discharge. However, it is crucial to identify causes of abdominal pain that require early surgical intervention, particularly when a clear diagnosis cannot be made before discharge. Pay special attention to red flags such as lethargy (in neonates and infants), severe pain or irritability, bilious emesis, abdominal distension, peritoneal signs, or signs of sepsis.

The differential diagnoses (DDx) for abdominal pain vary with age groups. In younger children who cannot express themselves, reliance on parental history and a thorough physical examination is essential. Blood investigations and radiology may not be helpful, especially in early presentations, making serial examinations and observation more valuable. Additionally, remember that pain from other sites can be referred to the abdomen, particularly testicular pain.

Epidemiology

Pediatric abdominal pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits, accounting for approximately 12% of all visits [2]. The median age of children presenting with abdominal pain is around 9 years, with a higher incidence in girls [2, 3]. Non-specific abdominal pain is the most prevalent diagnosis, affecting 40% of children, followed by functional abdominal pain (FAP), constipation, and viral infections [2, 4]. Despite the high prevalence of abdominal pain, a significant portion of children (62.7%) are discharged directly from the ED, while 37.3% require admission [3]. However, follow-up studies indicate that about 50% of children report ongoing pain after discharge, highlighting the chronic nature of abdominal pain [3]. 

Pathophysiology

The sensation of abdominal pain is transmitted either by somatic or visceral afferent fibres [5]. Visceral pain from the visceral peritoneum is poorly localised and is often referred to its corresponding dermatome on the abdominal wall. If you recall the human embryological development of abdominal organs, the organs developing from the foregut (oesophagus to the second part of the duodenum) have pain referred to the T8 dermatome (i.e., the epigastric area), those developing from the midgut (from the third part of the duodenum to the proximal two-thirds of the transverse colon) have pain referred to the T10 dermatome (i.e., the umbilical area), and those from the hindgut (distal one-third of the transverse colon to the rectum) refer to the T12 dermatome [6].

Somatic pain from the parietal peritoneum is more localised. Thus, any abdominal condition that progresses to involve the parietal peritoneum will result in the patient complaining of migrating pain. In unfortunate situations where this advances to bowel rupture or peritonitis (i.e., surgical abdomen), the patient will exhibit signs of peritonism. You can observe this in the history of appendicitis, where the pain initially starts in the periumbilical region and migrates to the right lower quadrant.

Referred pain also occurs due to the convergence of visceral and somatic pathways in the spinal column. Two examples of referred pain are diaphragmatic irritation leading to pain at the shoulder tip due to the convergence of visceral and somatic pathways at C4, and somatic pain from pneumonia leading to T10–11 pain perceived in the lower abdomen [5].

Initial Assessment and Stabilization

Airway & Breathing

  • Provide supplemental oxygen and attach an SPO2 probe.

Circulation

  • Assess for signs of sepsis, shock, dehydration, or the need for IV pain relief. If any of these are present, obtain IV access.
  • If in shock, administer an IV crystalloid fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg. Reassess and repeat if necessary.
  • If sepsis is suspected, obtain blood cultures via IV and administer Ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg (up to 2 g) AND metronidazole 10 mg/kg (up to 500 mg). Follow your local antibiotic guidelines.
  • If not in shock but dehydrated, initiate IV maintenance therapy.
  • Provide adequate pain control. Consider IV morphine 0.05–0.1 mg/kg or IV fentanyl 1 μg/kg.

Disability

  • Check a point-of-care glucose level in sick children. Consider hypoglycemia or DKA as alternative diagnoses.

Exposure

  • Examine the abdomen for abdominal distension, masses, or peritonism. Involve the surgical team early. This is further discussed in the physical examination section.
  • Always examine the genitals (e.g., for testicular torsion or strangulated hernia).

Medical History

In history, focus on the following:

Age of the child – DDx varies with the child’s age and the initial presenting complaints. Remember that neonates and infants often present with lethargy, irritability, poor feeding, or vomiting.

Age

Surgical diagnoses

Medical diagnoses

Birth to 3 months

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis
  • Pyloric stenosis
  • Malrotation with Midgut volvulus
  • Incarcerated hernia
  • Duodenal atresia
  • Testicular torsion
  • Non-Accidental Injury
  • Constipation
  • Reflux
  • Colic

3 months to 3 years

  • Malrotation with midgut volvulus
  • Intussusception
  • Appendicitis
  • Testicular torsion
  • Trauma
  • Non-Accidental Injury
  • Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP)
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Acute gastroenteritis
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Constipation
  • Mesenteric adenitis
  • Sickle cell–related vaso-occlusive crisis

3 years and above

  • Appendicitis
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Cholecystitis
  • Malignancy
  • Trauma
  • Testicular or ovarian torsion
  • Henoch-Schönlein purpura
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Pancreatitis
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Constipation
  • Acute gastroenteritis
  • Mesenteric adenitis
  • Strep pharyngitis
  • Pneumonia
  • Renal stones
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Irritable bowel disease
  • Functional abdominal pain
  • Gastritis/gastric ulcer
  • Ovarian cyst
  • Pregnancy
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Toxic ingestion

Timing of the symptoms:
a. Intussusception may follow a bout of diarrhoeal illness.
b. Appendicitis typically presents as a gradual onset of pain migrating from the periumbilical area to the right lower quadrant.

Pain character – Episodic pain is observed in intussusception and mesenteric adenitis.

Blood in stool – Consider necrotizing enterocolitis, intussusception, and volvulus.

Bilious or non-bilious vomiting – Bilious vomiting is indicative of obstruction below the ampulla of Vater. It is a classic presentation of malrotation with midgut volvulus and may also present in incarcerated/strangulated hernia or Hirschsprung disease with enterocolitis. Non-bilious vomiting is classically associated with pyloric stenosis.

Associated symptoms – A rash may be present in Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Fever, when associated with inflammation (e.g., appendicitis) or the translocation of gut bacteria, may lead to sepsis.

Oral intake, urine output (UOP), and activity levels – These are important. Escalate to a senior opinion for admission or IV hydration if these parameters are below 50% of the child’s baseline.

Other relevant history:

  • Past medical and surgical history, including birth history such as prematurity in neonates and infants.
  • Social history, especially when suspecting non-accidental injury.
  • Menstrual and sexual history in adolescent females.
  •  

Physical Examination

A good history and physical examination are very important in managing undifferentiated paediatric abdominal pain patients. You must perform an abdominal examination, including genitourinary and inguinal exams, especially in children who cannot express themselves. Remember that you may find little or no helpful clinical signs initially; however, serial examinations may reveal the condition as it evolves. A digital rectal examination is very rarely indicated, and even then, it should ideally be limited to once and performed by the surgeon [7].

Also, remember that these are children, and they may intentionally exhibit voluntary guarding during palpation if they are distressed, regardless of the cause. Covering the art of paediatric abdominal examination is beyond the scope of this chapter, but consider providing analgesia, employing distraction techniques, and building good rapport with the child.

Please ensure that your patients receive adequate analgesia before the examination, as this will make the patient cooperative, simplify the examination, and highlight clinical signs.

General Examination

  • Assess general appearance and determine whether the child looks ill or well.
  • Record temperature and other vital signs.
  • Observe for pallor and jaundice. Obtain an accurate body weight.
  • Observe the child walking to the examination bed or within the department. Children with peritonism may refuse to walk or walk slowly with a stooped posture.
  • Observe for signs of pain when coughing or jumping.

Inspection

  • Look for asymmetry and abdominal distension. Abdominal distension is less pronounced in higher bowel obstructions (e.g., midgut volvulus) than in lower bowel obstructions.
  • Check for purpuric patches, which are diffusely seen in Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP).

Palpation

  • Feel for any masses, tenderness, and peritonism. Remember that classic presentations of masses (e.g., an olive-shaped mass in pyloric stenosis or a sausage-shaped mass in intussusception) may not be palpable in the emergency department, as the condition may be intermittent or in an early stage.
  • Palpable bowel loops are classically associated with necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • Pyloric stenosis typically presents with a non-tender abdomen.
  • For most surgical causes, peritoneal findings can occur late. Consider the possibility of septic shock in a drowsy child presenting with abdominal tenderness on palpation.

Other Systems to Examine for Abdominal Pain [7]

  • Respiratory: Assess for signs of basal pneumonia.
  • ENT: Consider upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), tonsillitis, or adenopathy.
  • Neurological: Rule out meningitis.
  • Endocrine: Check blood glucose levels for diabetic ketoacidosis.
  • Haematological: Look for pallor and lymphadenopathy.
  • Dermatological: Look for rashes, particularly purpura/petechiae in Henoch-Schönlein purpura or zoster.
  • Renal: Check for oliguria, haematuria, or hypertension in haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

In Our Patient

Physical Examination: Abdominal examination revealed an ill-defined mass in the right upper quadrant (RUQ). No pain was elicited on testicular palpation. No anal fissures or bleeding were noted on rectal examination. There were no signs of peritonism.

When To Ask for Senior Help

Do not hesitate to contact your seniors if you are concerned about your patient. The points below serve as a guide:

  1. An ill-looking patient.
  2. May require IV access for hydration or analgesia.
  3. Presence of peritoneal signs.
  4. Signs of sepsis.
  5. Bilious vomiting.
  6. Non-accidental injury or inconsistent history.
  7. Neonates (especially premature babies), if you lack experience in treating them.
  8. Parental anxiety.

Not-To-Miss Diagnoses

Pediatric abdominal pain is a common and complex issue in emergency departments, requiring a thorough differential diagnosis to identify serious underlying conditions [8]. The etiologies of abdominal pain vary by age, with infants (<2 years) commonly presenting with congenital anomalies, malrotation, and intussusception [8]. In children aged 2-5 years, appendicitis, gastroenteritis, and mesenteric adenitis are frequent diagnoses [9], while school-aged children (5-12 years) are more likely to experience constipation, urinary tract infections, and respiratory infections [8]. Adolescents (>12 years) are at risk for pelvic inflammatory disease, pregnancy-related issues, and ovarian torsion [8]. Common conditions such as appendicitis, constipation, and gastroenteritis are prevalent across different age groups, and non-gastrointestinal causes like pneumonia and acute asthma can also manifest as abdominal pain [10]. A comprehensive approach to diagnosis and management is essential to identify serious underlying conditions that may require urgent intervention.

Causes Requiring Early Surgical Intervention

  • Peritonitis.
  • Appendicitis.
  • Testicular torsion.
  • Incarcerated hernia.
  • Necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • Intussusception.
  • Volvulus.
  • Hirschsprung’s disease.
  • Pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy in adolescent girls.
  • Ovarian torsion in adolescent girls.

Medical Causes Not to Miss

  • UTI in very young children (<5 years).
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis.
  • Sepsis.
  • Haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
  • Non-accidental injury.

Acing Diagnostic Testing

Remember that blood investigations are useful as supportive evidence for your history and physical examination, but they can be normal in surgical conditions. Avoid unnecessary venepuncture and/or IV cannulation in children unless the patient is sick or you are concerned about a not-to-miss diagnosis.

Bedside Tests

In sick patients, useful point-of-care tests include blood sugars, urine analysis, and capillary gas analysis. Blood sugars can indicate hypoglycaemia or DKA, and capillary gas analysis is useful for assessing lactate levels and metabolic acidosis. Urine analysis is helpful in confirming UTI, but ensure a proper uncontaminated sample has been collected [11]. Point-of-care ultrasound can be used for diagnosing intussusception, pyloric stenosis, or appendicitis.

Laboratory Tests

If venipuncture is performed, a full blood count, CRP, and renal function tests should be considered for all children. These tests may reveal evidence of inflammation or infection, as well as the extent of dehydration. You may also consider adding VBG and blood cultures for sicker children and tailor other testing depending on the patient (e.g., lipase for pancreatitis or beta HCG if pregnancy is suspected).

Imaging

Consider avoiding radiation or utilizing the lowest possible radiation dose. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice. In addition to point-of-care ultrasound, arrange an urgent departmental ultrasound if needed. If x-ray facilities are available, you can obtain a supine abdomen and upright/lateral decubitus view to look for free air. Computed tomography can be considered for life-threatening conditions when other modalities have failed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used in some parts of the world. It avoids radiation but may be time- or cost-prohibitive.

In Our Patient

  • Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) showed a target sign over the abdominal mass.
  • A diagnosis of intussusception was made.

Risk Stratification

Effective clinical decision rules (CDRs) for risk stratification of pediatric abdominal pain in emergency departments include the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Pediatric Intra-Abdominal Injury rule. The PECARN rule is for trauma patients and out of the discussion in this chapter. The PAS is a valuable tool for assessing the likelihood of acute appendicitis in children presenting with abdominal pain, with studies showing that PAS scores correlate significantly with the severity of appendicitis [12]. A score below 4 has been found to rule out appendicitis, while higher scores indicate a higher risk of appendicitis [12]. Additionally, a recent Non-Specific Abdominal Pain (NSAP) Model has been developed to differentiate non-specific abdominal pain from organic causes, identifying key clinical predictors such as pain location and associated symptoms, and achieving a sensitivity of 71.8% [13]. These CDRs assist clinicians in identifying patients at risk for serious conditions, optimizing diagnostic processes, and reducing unnecessary interventions.

Management

Empiric and Symptomatic Treatment

Correct dehydration either orally in stable children or via IV in children who may need to be kept nil-by-mouth or are too sick to tolerate oral intake.

Consider keeping possible surgical patients nil-by-mouth. For bowel obstruction, consider inserting a nasogastric tube for gastric decompression.

Treat pain and distress.

  • Consider non-pharmacological methods (e.g., examine the child on the parent’s lap).

Paracetamol

  • Dose per kg: 15 mg/kg
  • Frequency: Every 4 hours (q4h)
  • Maximum Dose: 60 mg/kg/day
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • Ask for allergies.
    • Check if/when the patient took acetaminophen at home.

Fentanyl

  • Dose per kg: Intranasal 1.5 mcg/kg (for >12 months of age)
  • Frequency: Every 15 minutes
  • Maximum Dose: 3 mcg/kg
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • Not recommended for children <12 months of age.
    • Divide the dose between nostrils.
    • Consider alternative analgesia after the second dose.

Morphine

  • Dose per kg:
    • IV/Subcutaneous: 0.05–0.1 mg/kg
  • Frequency: Every 2–4 hours
  • Maximum Dose:
    • For <1 month: 0.1 mg/kg every 4–6 hours
    • For 1–12 months: 0.1 mg/kg every 2–4 hours
    • For >12 months: 0.2 mg/kg every 2–4 hours
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • There is a chance of respiratory depression if the dose exceeds the recommended amount.

If sepsis is suspected, administer IV Cefotaxime and IV Metronidazole, or follow your local antibiotic guidelines.

Cefotaxime

  • Dose per kg: IV 50 mg/kg
  • Frequency: Every 12 hours
  • Maximum Dose: 2000 mg
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • Can be given intramuscularly (IM) if IV access is difficult.

Metronidazole

  • Dose per kg: IV 10 mg/kg
  • Frequency: Every 8 hours
  • Maximum Dose: 500 mg
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • Consider alternative analgesia after the second dose.

Piperacillin + Tazobactam

  • Indication: For pseudomonal coverage in sepsis or hospital-acquired infections.
  • Dose per kg:
    • 2 months to 9 months: IV 80 mg/kg
    • 9 months: IV 100 mg/kg
  • Frequency: Every 8 hours
  • Maximum Dose: 3000 mg
  • Cautions/Comments:
    • The dose is calculated based on the piperacillin component.

IV Fluids

  • Use isotonic crystalloids. Avoid hypotonic solutions in the ED, except in rare circumstances as advised by paediatric nephrologists or paediatricians.
  • For resuscitation, use 0.9% saline in 10–20 ml/kg boluses for all ages. You can repeat the boluses as necessary, but assess for signs of heart failure before administering each bolus.
  • For IV maintenance, use a 0.9% saline and 5% dextrose combination if available. This can be prepared by mixing 450 ml of 0.9% saline with 50 ml of 50% dextrose. Alternatively, you can use 0.9% saline, Hartmann’s solution, or follow local guidelines.

When To Admit This Patient

If you are able to arrive at a diagnosis for these patients, then the disposition is often straightforward. On the other hand, patients with severe pain despite a negative physical examination and unclear diagnosis will require admission for observation and serial physical examinations.

If parents confirm that oral intake, UOP, and activity levels are less than 50% of the child’s baseline, the child should be admitted for IV hydration and observation. A short-stay unit may be suitable for such patients.

If there is a suspicion of non-accidental injury or any social circumstances (e.g., inability to return for review due to financial constraints or travel issues in rural areas), discuss admission with your senior doctor. Consider reviewing well-appearing neonates with seniors, especially if you think they can be safely discharged home.

Otherwise, well children with likely benign causes can be discharged home. Ensure that clear and close follow-up is arranged with their general practitioner or pediatrician.

Advise parents on when to return (e.g., if the child’s oral intake, UOP, or activity level reduces to less than 50% of their usual baseline, or if symptoms of sepsis or shock develop) and provide guidance on follow-up (either with their general practitioner or the nearest hospital with surgical capacity to review the child). If any outpatient radiological investigations are planned for the coming days, educate parents about the importance of attending these procedures as well.

Revisiting Your Patient

Our 18-month-old patient was confirmed to have an intussusception by point-of-care ultrasound.

On reviewing his history, the episodic crying and preceding viral illness are supportive of this diagnosis, and the lack of fever or other associated symptoms rules out most other diagnoses. The classical triad of abdominal pain, vomiting, and red-currant jelly stool described in patients is present in less than 50% of patients with the disease [14]. However, a better clue is that it is associated with lethargy even without signs of sepsis or dehydration.

His examination revealed normal vital signs, was afebrile, and had a soft, non-tender abdomen with an ill-defined lower abdominal mass, which also supports this diagnosis.
The ABCDE or primary survey did not show any other abnormalities.

He was kept nil-by-mouth, IV maintenance fluids were started, and an urgent surgical referral was made. Antibiotics were not needed at this stage as there was no other supportive evidence of associated sepsis. He was prescribed PRN pain relief with fentanyl and morphine but did not require any during the ED stay.

The surgical team reviewed him and took him to the operating theatre for air enema reduction.

Authors

Picture of Prassana Nadarajah

Prassana Nadarajah

Listen to the chapter

References

  1. Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996;98(4):680-685. doi:10.1542/peds.98.4.680
  2. Magnúsdóttir MB, Róbertsson V, Þorgrímsson S, Rósmundsson Þ, Agnarsson Ú, Haraldsson Á. Abdominal pain is a common and recurring problem in paediatric emergency departments. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(10):1905-1910. doi:10.1111/apa.14782
  3. Lee WH, O’Brien S, Skarin D, et al. Pediatric Abdominal Pain in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):593-598. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001789
  4. Pant C, Deshpande A, Sferra TJ, Olyaee M. Emergency department visits related to functional abdominal pain in the pediatric age group. J Investig Med. 2017;65(4):803-806. doi:10.1136/jim-2016-000300
  5. Simpson E, Smith A. The management of acute abdominal pain in children. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 1996;32(2):110-112. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb00905.x
  6. Sadler TW, Langman J, Langman J. In: Langman’s Medical Embryology. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012:208-229.
  7. Cameron P, Brown G, Biswadev M, Dalziel S, Craig S. Textbook of Paediatric Emergency Medicine. Elsevier; 2019.
  8. Reust CE, Williams A. Acute Abdominal Pain in Children. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(10):830-836.
  9. Yang WC, Chen CY, Wu HP. Etiology of non-traumatic acute abdomen in pediatric emergency departments. World J Clin Cases. 2013;1(9):276-284. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v1.i9.276
  10. Kandamany N, O’Neill M. The Aetiology of Acute Abdominal Pain in Children 2–12 Years of Age. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2012;97:A478.
  11. The Royal Children’s hospital melbourne. The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Accessed May 25, 2023. https://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Urine_samples/#:~:text=Clean%20the%20skin%20around%20the%20genital%20area%2C%20using%20gauze%20if,sample%20container%20touch%20the%20skin.
  12. Vevaud K, Dallocchio A, Dumoitier N, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the contribution of the pediatric appendicitis score in the decision process. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24(1):131. Published 2024 Feb 19. doi:10.1186/s12887-024-04619-z
  13. Bouënel M, Lefebvre V, Trouillet C, Diesnis R, Pouessel G, Karaca-Altintas Y. Determining clinical predictors to identify non-specific abdominal pain and the added value of laboratory examinations: A prospective derivation study in a paediatric emergency department. Acta Paediatr. 2023;112(10):2218-2227. doi:10.1111/apa.16911
  14. Simon R.A, Hugh T.J, Curtin A.M. Childhood intussusception in a regional hospital. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64:699–702.

Reviewed and Edited By

Picture of Erin Simon, DO

Erin Simon, DO

Dr. Erin L. Simon is a Professor of Emergency Medicine at Northeast Ohio Medical University. She is Vice Chair of Research for Cleveland Clinic Emergency Services and Medical Director for the Cleveland Clinic Bath emergency department. Dr. Simon serves as a reviewer for multiple academic emergency medicine journals.

Picture of Arif Alper Cevik, MD, FEMAT, FIFEM

Arif Alper Cevik, MD, FEMAT, FIFEM

Prof Cevik is an Emergency Medicine academician at United Arab Emirates University, interested in international emergency medicine, emergency medicine education, medical education, point of care ultrasound and trauma. He is the founder and director of the International Emergency Medicine Education Project – iem-student.org, chair of the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) core curriculum and education committee and board member of the Asian Society for Emergency Medicine and Emirati Board of Emergency Medicine.

Question Of The Day #40

question of the day

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient?

This elderly patient presents to the emergency department with left lower abdominal pain, constipation, and anorexia. The exam shows fever, tachycardia, and marked left lower quadrant tenderness. Compared to younger patients, abdominal pain in an elderly patient has a higher likelihood of being due to a surgical emergency or from a diagnosis that carries higher mortality. Elderly patients may have more nonspecific associated symptoms that may make it difficult to confirm a dangerous diagnosis without advanced imaging. Additionally, elderly patients do not always have a fever or elevated white blood cells during an abdominal infection. The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in an elderly patient should be broad and encompass conditions related to many body systems.

The most likely diagnosis for this patient is diverticulitis based on the location of the pain. Features of diverticulitis include left lower quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, change in bowel habits (diarrhea or constipation), anorexia, fever, and leukocytosis. Right-sided diverticulitis is more common in patients of Asian descent, so these patients may alternatively present with right lower quadrant pain. Treatment for acute diverticulitis includes antibiotics, bowel rest, hydration, increased dietary fiber, and pain management.

Other potential diagnoses to consider for this patient include perforated diverticulitis, abdominal abscess, colitis, bowel obstruction, malignancy, AAA, urinary tract infection, ureterolithiasis, and soft tissue infections. The best next step in the management of this patient is to treat empirically for an abdominal infection with IV hydration, antipyretics, and antibiotics. Sepsis from a gastrointestinal source requires antibiotics that cover both gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria. IV Vancomycin (Choice A) is helpful for skin infections, soft tissue infections, MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staph aureus) infections, or other infections from gram-positive organisms. Vancomycin would not include coverage for a gastrointestinal source. IV Metronidazole covers anaerobic bacteria, and Ciprofloxacin covers gram-negative bacteria. This makes Choice D the best antibiotic choice for this patient. Other options include IV ampicillin-sulbactam, ampicillin and metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, or imipenem. A CT scan on the abdomen and pelvis (Choice B) should be performed on this patient (ideally with PO and IV contrast). However, IV hydration and antibiotics are a more important initial step to address the patient’s sepsis. CT scanning is recommended for first-time diverticulitis episodes or if there are alternative diagnoses on the differential. Patients with a history of recurrent diverticulitis who present to the Emergency department with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis are able to be treated empirically with oral antibiotics in the outpatient setting. Ill-appearing patients, have no prior history of diverticulitis or have possible alternative diagnoses should get CT imaging. Emergent colonoscopy (Choice C) is not indicated as part of the Emergency department management of acute diverticulitis. In fact, colonic inflammation or inflamed diverticuli are contraindications to colonoscopy (increased risk of bowel rupture). Correct answer: D

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #39

question of the day
Abnormal Right Upper Quadrant

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient?

This female patient presents to the Emergency department with atraumatic right shoulder pain, generalized abdominal discomfort, and vaginal bleeding.  She is found to have a positive urine pregnancy test and signs of shock on physical exam (hypotension and tachycardia).  The FAST exam (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) demonstrates free fluid around the liver.  This quick bedside sonographic exam evaluates the right upper quadrant (liver, right kidney, right lung base), left upper quadrant (spleen, left kidney, left lung base), suprapubic area (bladder), and subxiphoid area (view of heart).  The FAST exam is typically used in the setting of trauma to assess for intra-abdominal bleeding, or “free fluid”.  Fluid on ultrasound appears black, or anechoic.  In the setting of trauma or presumed hemorrhagic shock, free fluid is assumed to be blood.  The hepato-renal recess, also known as Morrison’s pouch, is the most common site for fluid to be seen on a FAST exam.  For this reason, the right upper quadrant should always be viewed first during a FAST exam if there is concern for hemorrhagic shock.  The patient’s right upper quadrant FAST view is annotated below.

This patient is in shock with free fluid in her right upper quadrant FAST view.  In the setting of a pregnancy of unknown origin, shock, and abdominal free fluid, a ruptured ectopic pregnancy is assumed to be the diagnosis.  A cystic adnexal structure and a uterus without a gestational sac can also be noted on ultrasound.  Ectopic pregnancy can present with mild symptoms ranging from abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding to signs of shock with hemoperitoneum as in this patient.  Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy include prior ectopic pregnancies, prior tubal surgeries, prior sexually transmitted infections, tobacco smoking, and use of an intrauterine device (IUD).  Initial Emergency department treatment should include volume resuscitation with blood products, pre-operative laboratory testing, and prompt OB/GYN consultation (Choice C).  Patients who are unstable, show signs of shock, or have large ectopic pregnancies are treated operatively.  Patients with stable vital signs, small ectopic pregnancies, and minimal symptoms are treated medically with Methotrexate (Choice A).   This patient’s hemodynamic instability makes Methotrexate contraindicated in her treatment course.  The patient’s atraumatic shoulder pain is likely from free fluid in the right upper quadrant, causing referred pain to the shoulder from diaphragmatic irritation.  A shoulder X-ray (Choice B) is not indicated in this patient.  Rho(D) immune globulin (RhoGAM) (Choice D) is an important treatment to provide in Rh-negative mothers with ectopic pregnancy.  RhoGAM is indicated in maternal-fetal hemorrhage in order to prevent the maternal immune system from attacking fetal Rh-positive cells in future pregnancies.  RhoGAM is indicated in Rh-negative mothers, not Rh-positive mothers.  The question does not indicate the mother’s blood type or Rh status, however, RhoGAM is not the best initial treatment.  Treatment of the hemorrhagic shock and OB/GYN consultation are the best next steps.  Correct Answer: C

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #38

question of the day
251 - Gallbladder stone with thickened wall
Which of the following is the most likely cause for this patient’s condition?

This patient presents to the emergency department with upper abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The physical exam demonstrates fever, tachycardia, and focal right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness. Differential diagnoses to consider include cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, and ruptured peptic ulcer. The ultrasound image provided shows a thickened gallbladder wall (>4mm) and a gallstone present. See the labeled image below.

Signs of acute cholecystitis on ultrasound include a thickened gallbladder wall, pericholecystic fluid (anechoic (black) fluid around gallbladder), the presence of a gallstone (hyperechoic (white) with posterior shadowing), sonographic Murphy sign (tenderness when the transducer is pressed into gallbladder), and a dilated gallbladder. This patient has some but not all sonographic signs of cholecystitis. However, the age, obese body habitus, fever, and location of the pain support a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (Choice B). Treatment of acute cholecystitis involves IV hydration, parenteral pain management and antiemetics, IV antibiotics, and surgical consultation for cholecystectomy. Biliary colic (Choice A) is less likely given the ultrasound findings and fever on exam. If the patient’s vital signs were normal and the ultrasound showed gallstones with no other sonographic signs of cholecystitis, biliary colic would be more likely. Gastritis (Choice C) does not cause fever or the sonographic signs illustrated above. Gallstones are the most common cause of pancreatitis (Choice D), but there is focal tenderness over the gallbladder in the right upper quadrant. Additional findings, such as an elevated lipase level, pain that radiates to the back, or a history of alcohol abuse would make pancreatitis a more likely diagnosis. Correct Answer: B

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #37

question of the day
25.1 - obstruction volvulus coffee bean 1

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient?

This elderly male patient presents to the emergency department with generalized abdominal pain and distension. Compared to younger patients, abdominal pain in an elderly patient has a higher likelihood of being due to a surgical emergency or from a diagnosis that carries higher mortality. Elderly patients may have more nonspecific associated symptoms that may make it difficult to confirm a dangerous diagnosis without advanced imaging. Additionally, elderly patients do not always have a fever or elevated white blood cells during an abdominal infection. The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in an elderly patient should be broad and encompass conditions related to many body systems.

The abdominal X-ray demonstrates a “coffee bean sign” and dilated loops of the large bowel (note haustra of the large bowel). The image supports the diagnosis of sigmoid volvulus, a type of large bowel obstruction that necessitates prompt surgical consultation in the Emergency department. Risk factors for sigmoid volvulus are elderly age, constipation, poor mobility, and residence in a long-term care facility. If left untreated, volvulus can result in intestinal ischemia, necrosis, perforation, and peritonitis. Sigmoid volvulus is most often treated with manual intestinal detorsion through flexible sigmoidoscopy or rectal tube. Cecal volvulus is more common in younger patients, and requires surgical bowel resection or cecopexy (fixing the cecum to the abdominal wall).

The abdominal X-ray provided is sufficient to make the diagnosis of volvulus. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (Choice A) is not necessary for this patient. Surgical consultation is the next best step. IV antibiotics (Choice D) are indicated in volvulus if there are signs of intestinal perforation, necrosis, or peritonitis. The question stem indicates that although the abdomen is tender and distended, the abdomen is soft. This makes peritonitis and the need for antibiotics less likely. Surgical consultation for colectomy (Choice B) would be correct if the patient had cecal volvulus or if there were signs of bowel necrosis. Surgical consultation for bowel detorsion (Choice C) is the best next step for this patient with sigmoid volvulus. Correct Answer: C

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #36

question of the day
Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis of this patient’s condition?

A hernia is an abnormal defect in the abdominal wall through which intra-abdominal contents (i.e., bowel) can protrude. About 10% of the population experiences hernias at one time during their lifetime. Hernias can cause symptoms that range from mild discomfort to severe pain with signs of bowel obstruction, perforation, necrosis, or peritonitis. The most common type of hernia is the inguinal hernia located along the inguinal crease. Other hernias include the femoral hernia, obturator hernia, Richter hernia, internal hernias, and ventral hernias (umbilical, incisional, Spigelian hernia types). Hernias are further classified as reducible, incarcerated (firm, painful, nonreducible), or strangulated (firm, severely painful, nonreducible, overlying skin redness or crepitus, signs of bowel necrosis or obstruction).

This patient has a right inguinal hernia on exam with overlying skin redness, severe tenderness, and signs of intestinal obstruction (vomiting, constipation, abdominal distension). This should raise concern over a strangulated hernia, which is a surgical emergency. Treatment includes IV hydration, IV antibiotics, and prompt surgical consultation for operative management. The patient’s inguinal hernia is not incarcerated (Choice A), the hernia is strangulated. A Spigelian hernia (Choice B) is located along the lateral ventral abdomen along with the rectus abdominal muscle. Spigelian hernias have a high rate of incarceration compared to other hernias. This patient’s hernia is located along the inguinal crease, not the ventral abdominal wall. Fournier’s gangrene is a severe necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum. Although early Fournier’s gangrene may lack subcutaneous emphysema and marked skin redness, the location and other historical details make a strangulated inguinal hernia a more likely diagnosis. Choice D is the correct answer.

Correct Answer: D

References

[cite]

iEM Image Feed: Gallbladder Stone

iem image feed

A 35-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with right upper quadrant pain of two hours duration. She awoke several hours after eating a large meal. Based on increasing pain and nausea she presents for evaluation. She denies vomiting, fever or dysuria. Her past history is notable for diet-controlled type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, and essential hypertension. Her BMI is 33. Her only medication is lisinopril 10 mg daily. She has never had surgery. Her social history is unremarkable. She neither drinks alcohol nor uses tobacco. She has begun to diet and reports recent weight loss.

Her temperature is 37ºC, blood pressure: 110/70 mmHg, pulse: 90 beats per minute. Physical exam reveals an overweight female in mild distress secondary to right upper quadrant pain. She cannot find a position of comfort and describes the pain as similar to labor pains. Pertinent exam findings include: chest exam normal, cardiac exam normal, abdominal exam demonstrates normal bowel sounds and no rebound in any quadrant. She has guarding to inspiration with palpation over the gallbladder (positive Murphy’s sign). Rectal exam normal, stool is hemoccult negative for blood. Pertinent lab values: glucose 110 mg/dl, alkaline phosphatase 120 U/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 25 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 25 U/L, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) 20 U/L, direct bilirubin 0.1 mg/dL, total bilirubin 0.5 mg/dL, lipase 20 U/L.

The emergency physician performs a focused right upper quadrant ultrasound and finds gallstones without associated gallbladder wall thickening or pericholecystic fluid. In addition, the patient has a “sonographic Murphy sign”: there is maximal abdominal tenderness when the ultrasound probe is pressed over the visualized gallbladder.

79 - gall bladder stone

Further reading

[cite]

Question Of The Day #35

question of the day
qod35
29.2 - small bowel obstruction 2
Which of the following is the most likely cause for this patient’s condition?

This patient presents to the emergency department with generalized abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and constipation. The physical exam demonstrates tachycardia and a distended and diffusely tender abdomen. The patient has three prior abdominal surgeries. The upright abdominal X-ray shows multiple dilated loops of small bowel with air-fluid levels. The information provided by the history, physical exam, and diagnostic imaging collectively supports a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a mechanical blockage to forward flow through the intestines. The majority of SBOs are caused by post-operative scar tissue formation (adhesions), but other causes include hernias, intra-abdominal malignancies, foreign bodies, and Crohn’s disease. Symptoms include intermittent colicky abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting, and constipation. Some patients may be able to pass stool and flatus early in the timeline of an SBO or if the obstruction is partial, rather than complete. Typical exam findings in SBO are a diffusely tender abdomen and high-pitched bowel sounds. Findings of abdominal rigidity, guarding, or fever should raise concern about possible intestinal perforation, peritonitis, or intestinal necrosis. Diagnosis is made clinically in combination with diagnostic imaging, such as abdominal X-rays, CT scanning, or ultrasound. CT scans have better sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing an SBO than Xray. Abdominal ultrasound is more sensitive and specific in diagnosing SBO than CT scan, but this test requires a skilled practitioner to get high-quality results. Treatment of SBO involves IV hydration, surgical consultation for possible operative intervention, pain medications, antiemetics, and electrolyte repletion. Nasogastric tube placement for gastric decompression is helpful in patients who have marked abdominal distension, intractable vomiting, or have risks for aspiration (i.e. altered mental status).

The most common cause of SBO is adhesions (Choice B), not malignancy (Choice A). Diabetic ketoacidosis (Choice C) can present with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. However, DKA becomes more likely when the glucose is elevated over 250mg/dL. The presence of air-fluid levels and dilated small bowel on X-ray imaging also supports SBO over DKA. Delayed gastric emptying (Choice D) is the cause of gastroparesis, a diagnosis that can also present as nausea and vomiting. The other signs, symptoms, and imaging results make SBO a more likely diagnosis than gastroparesis.

References

[cite]

iEM Image Feed: Viscus perforation

iem image feed

A 35 years old previously healthy gentleman presented to the Emergency Department with a sudden-onset severe and diffuse abdominal pain which started an hour ago. Chest X-ray was ordered; what do you see?

Abdominal pain is one of the commonest ED presentations. Like acute MI, AAA rupture, or DKA, viscus perforation should be in our worst-case scenario list. The image shows free air under the diaphragm.

The expected hints for this type of patient are a history of peptic/duodenal ulcer disease, severe abdominal pain that patients do not want to move, and a rigid and very tender abdomen, which any palpation gives much pain to the patient. 

We need to remember that this situation is a surgical emergency. There are some steps that we need to do immediately for this patient.

  1. Proper history and examination
  2. Attaching to monitor and following vital signs and intervene if necessary to normalize them
  3. Opening 2 large-bore IV lines and fluid resuscitation as needed
  4. IV pain medication
  5. IV antibiotics
  6. Stopping oral ingestion and placing NG tube
  7. Contact surgery
  8. Sending basic biochemistry lab, coagulation profile, blood type and cross, CBC, which will be asked by surgery soon. 
  9. Arranging transfer to the OR
887.1 - viscus perforation

Abdominal pain is one of the commonest ED presentations. Like acute MI, AAA rupture, or DKA, viscus perforation should be in our worst-case scenario list. The image shows free air under the diaphragm.

887.2 - viscus perforation

The expected hints for this type of patient are a history of peptic/duodenal ulcer disease, severe abdominal pain that patients do not want to move, and a rigid and very tender abdomen, which any palpation gives much pain to the patient. 

We need to remember that this situation is a surgical emergency. There are some steps that we need to do immediately for this patient.

  1. Proper history and examination
  2. Attaching to monitor and following vital signs and intervene if necessary to normalize them
  3. Opening 2 large-bore IV lines and fluid resuscitation as needed
  4. IV pain medication
  5. IV antibiotics
  6. Stopping oral ingestion and placing NG tube
  7. Contact surgery
  8. Sending basic biochemistry lab, coagulation profile, blood type and cross, CBC, which will be asked by surgery soon. 
  9. Arranging transfer to the OR

Additional reading

[cite]

Question Of The Day #34

question of the day
qod34

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient’s condition?

This patient is pregnant in the first trimester presenting to the Emergency department with right lower quadrant pain. Any first trimester pregnant patient with abdominal pain should be evaluated for ectopic pregnancy. Other causes of this symptom include ovarian torsion, ovarian cyst rupture, pelvic inflammatory disease, tubo-ovarian abscess, urinary tract infection, ureterolithiasis, colitis, or appendicitis. An intra-uterine pregnancy is confirmed on transvaginal ultrasound which excludes ectopic pregnancy from the differential. Ovarian pathologies are also investigated on the ultrasound and are not discovered. 

Another common diagnosis based on the patient’s pain location, young age, and markedly tender abdomen is acute appendicitis. The most common presenting symptom in appendicitis is right lower quadrant pain. Other signs include fever, anorexia, nausea, or vomiting.  Pregnant women may present with back or flank pain, rather than right lower quadrant pain, as the uterus may displace the appendix in the abdomen. There is no single symptom or laboratory test that can reliably exclude the diagnosis of appendicitis. The gold standard test for acute appendicitis diagnosis is a CT scan of the abdomen with IV contrast dye. PO or PR contrast are additionally used in some institutions based on preference and protocols.  In children, appendiceal ultrasound is performed first to avoid excessive radiation exposure and financial cost. CT scanning (Choice A) is similarly avoided in first-trimester pregnancy to diagnose appendicitis, although it is the test of choice in non-pregnant adults. MRI imaging of the abdomen and pelvis (Choice C) is another diagnostic option for pregnant patients, but this is not recommended until an ultrasound is performed. IV antibiotics (Choice D) may be needed to treat appendicitis or other abdominal infections, but this patient lacks a definitive diagnosis or signs of sepsis or shock which would support emergent antibiotics. The best next step to further evaluate the cause of this patient’s symptoms is conducting an appendiceal ultrasound (Choice B). If this study is non-conclusive or is not available, an MRI should be performed. 

Emergency department treatment for acute appendicitis is IV antibiotics, IV hydration, and surgical consultation for appendectomy. Immediate surgery may be avoided in patients who present several days after symptom onset or with a ruptured appendix. These cases are treated with IV antibiotics, IV hydration, bowel rest, and close monitoring.

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #33

question of the day
qod33
AAA CT scan possible rupture

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient’s condition?

This elderly male patient presents to the emergency department with abdominal pain. Compared to younger patients, abdominal pain in an elderly patient has a higher likelihood of being due to a surgical emergency or from a diagnosis that carries a higher mortality. Elderly patients may have more nonspecific associated symptoms that may make it difficult to confirm a dangerous diagnosis without advanced imaging. Additionally, elderly patients do not always have a fever or elevated white blood cells during an abdominal infection. The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in an elderly patient should be broad and encompass conditions related to many body systems.

The syncopal event and signs of shock should raise concern for a more serious etiology of the patient’s symptoms. The CT image provided shows a dilated aorta filled with contrast dye and a large surrounding intra-luminal thrombus. An infrarenal abdominal aorta measuring over 3cm is considered aneurysmal. This patient’s abdominal aorta measures approximately 7cm from outer wall to outer wall using the scale provided on the right-hand side of the image. The green measurement line in the image below shows the size of the aorta from outer wall to outer wall (includes thrombus).

The diagnosis for this patient is a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This condition carries a high mortality and is often lethal without prompt surgical intervention (Choice A). Administration of blood products is helpful if there are signs of hemorrhagic shock as in this patient. Antibiotics, like IV Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam (Choice B), are not helpful in the management of this diagnosis. Endotracheal intubation (Choice C) is needed prior to operative intervention, but Emergency department management should focus on volume resuscitation and close communication with the surgical team for operative repair. IV Heparin (Choice D) may be beneficial in acute mesenteric ischemia from an embolic etiology (i.e. Atrial fibrillation), but anticoagulation would worsen this patient’s hemorrhagic shock.

AAAs can present to the Emergency department without any symptoms and be discovered incidentally on imaging or on physical exam as a pulsatile abdominal mass. Other presentations include severe back pain (the abdominal aorta is retroperitoneal) and circulatory shock. Rupture of a AAA can be large and result in rapid decompensation and death, or bleeding can be contained in the retroperitoneal space with transiently stable vital signs. Risk factors for AAA formation are male sex, tobacco use, hypertension, increased patient age, Marfans syndrome, or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The diagnosis of AAA is clinical and includes the use of bedside aortic ultrasound or CT aortic angiogram imaging. Treatment for AAA depends on aortic size and patient symptoms. Operative repair is indicated for any AAA over 5.5cm diameter in men, over 5.0cm diameter in women, or any size if there are signs of shock or concern for AAA rupture.

References

[cite]

Question Of The Day #32

question of the day
qod32

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient’s condition?

This patient has intermittent epigastric abdominal pain with nausea and vomiting that radiates to the back. He has a history of alcohol abuse, but lacks tremors or tongue fasciculations to demonstrate signs of active alcohol withdrawal. Laboratory testing reveals pre-renal acute kidney injury (BUN/Creatinine ratio >20), elevated liver function tests with a hepatocellular pattern (AST>ALT in 2:1 ratio), and a markedly elevated lipase.  This information supports a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Administration of IV midazolam, a benzodiazepine, would be an appropriate next step if the patient had signs or symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. Alcohol withdrawal can begin as early as 6 hours after refraining from alcohol intake in a chronic alcohol user.  Information regarding alcohol intake is not provided in the question, but objective clinical signs indicating withdrawal are not present on exam. Ordering a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (Choice B) is not required in making the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.  A CT scan can be helpful if you are considering an alternative diagnosis (i.e. AAA, abdominal abscess, etc) or if there is concern for sepsis or fulminant pancreatitis. 

 

Diagnosis of pancreatitis is made clinically based on the history and physical exam, risk factors for the disease, and laboratory testing.  Pancreatitis typically presents as upper abdominal pain that radiates to the flanks and back.  Nausea and vomiting are frequent accompanying symptoms. The disease can range from mild symptoms to severe symptoms with pancreatic necrosis, multi-organ failure, shock, and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Serum lipase testing is more specific than amylase for pancreatitis. Lipase is elevated in pancreatitis.  Risk factors for the disease include gallstones, alcohol use, abdominal trauma, recent ERCP, hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatic ischemia, scorpion envenomation, certain viral infections (Mumps, CMV), hypercalcemia, and certain medications (sulfonamides, azathioprine, valproic acid, etc).  The most common cause of first-time pancreatitis is gallstones. A gallbladder ultrasound should always be performed in patients with a gallbladder who present with pancreatitis. A surgical consultation (Choice C) for gallbladder removal would be warranted if this patient had gallstone pancreatitis, but the patient has a history of a cholecystectomy. The likely cause of this patient’s pancreatitis is his alcohol abuse which causes direct pancreatic injury and inflammation. Treatment of pancreatitis includes IV hydration (Choice D), analgesia, antiemetics, and monitoring for electrolyte abnormalities. Avoiding food or liquid intake (NPO) for “pancreatic rest” has been recommended historically for all cases of pancreatitis, however there is not robust evidence to support this practice.  Routine antibiotics are not recommended for acute pancreatitis, unless there are signs of sepsis.

References

[cite]