Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia (2024)

You have a new patient!

An 80-year-old gentleman presents to our department with a two-day history of abdominal pain accompanied by diarrhea and nausea. He describes the pain as recurrent, having occurred periodically over the past two years, with a crescendo pattern. However, this current episode has not been resolved and is excruciating.

a-photo-of-an-80-year-old-male-patient-(the image was produced by using ideogram 2.0)

A review of his medical records reveals a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, a previous transient ischemic attack, and atrial fibrillation (AF). He underwent cholecystectomy many years ago for biliary colic. There is no other significant medical history.

On examination, his vital signs are as follows:

  • Blood pressure is 95/57 mmHg.
  • Pulse is 126 beats per minute.
  • Respiratory rate is 26 breaths per minute.
  • Oxygen saturation is 95%.
  • He is afebrile.

The patient appears pale, diaphoretic, and in significant discomfort. There is no clinical jaundice. Abdominal examination reveals diffuse tenderness, most prominent centrally, without guarding. Bowel sounds are sluggish. A cholecystectomy scar is noted in the right hypochondrium. Cardiac examination reveals irregular tachycardia, and the lungs are clear. Examination of the lower limbs is unremarkable, with no swelling. Stool is brown, with no visible blood or melena.

How would you proceed with further evaluation for this patient?

What do you need to know?

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) refers to the sudden loss of blood flow to the small intestine, typically due to arterial insufficiency caused by an embolus or thrombus. AMI falls under the broader category of intestinal ischemia, which includes ischemia of the colon and, more rarely, the stomach and upper gastrointestinal tract. Other forms of intestinal malperfusion include venous occlusion as well as chronic or non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia [1].

Importance

Acute mesenteric ischemia carries an alarmingly high mortality rate, estimated between 60–80%. This is exacerbated by its nonspecific presentation, which often delays diagnosis and increases the likelihood of complications. Early recognition, timely resuscitation and treatment, and prompt advocacy for intervention are essential to improving outcomes [2,3].

Epidemiology

The incidence of AMI in developed countries is approximately 5 per 100,000 people annually, with a prevalence of around 0.1% of all hospital admissions.

AMI primarily occurs in patients with pre-existing atherosclerotic disease of arteries, often associated with risk factors such as advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation [4].

A non-exhaustive list of risk factors includes [1]:

  • Cardiac conditions (e.g., atrial fibrillation, recent myocardial infarction)
  • Aortic surgery or instrumentation
  • Peripheral artery disease
  • Haemodialysis
  • Use of vasoconstrictive medications
  • Prothrombotic disorders
  • Systemic inflammation or infections
  • Hypovolaemic states
  • Bowel strangulation (e.g., volvulus, hernias)
  • Vascular compression syndromes.

Pathophysiology

The intestinal system exhibits relatively low oxygen extraction; residual oxygenated blood from intestinal veins is delivered to the liver via the portal vein. For ischaemic damage to occur, blood flow must be reduced by at least 50% of normal levels [1].

Interestingly, mesenteric arteries are less affected by atherosclerosis compared to other similarly sized vessels, likely due to protective hemodynamic factors. As a result, patients with AMI often have concurrent atherosclerotic conditions elsewhere, such as cerebrovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease, or peripheral vascular disease. Regarding the mechanism,

  • Embolism of the mesenteric artery accounts for ~50% and
  • Thrombosis of the mesenteric artery accounts for ~25% of AMI cases.

Mesenteric venous thrombosis can mimic AMI in a minority of cases, often presenting as nonspecific abdominal pain with diarrhea lasting 1–2 weeks. In some instances, these thrombi resolve spontaneously.

Medical History

The primary symptom of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is central and severe abdominal pain, classically described as being “out of proportion” to physical examination findings. The initial pain is due to visceral ischemia, which initially spares the parietal peritoneum. Peritonism with abdominal rigidity typically develops later, indicating full-thickness ischemia, necrosis, or perforation [5].

Early symptoms may include persistent vomiting and defecation. As the condition progresses, passage of altered blood may occur. Unfortunately, associated gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea can mimic infective causes, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. While bloody diarrhea is more commonly associated with colonic ischemia, it is less frequent in small bowel ischemia.

In some cases, AMI is preceded by symptoms of chronic non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. Patients often report recurrent, postprandial abdominal pain resulting from an inability to increase blood flow to meet intestinal vascular demands. This may lead to a fear of eating and significant weight loss. In patients with chronic non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, symptoms tend to be even more vague. Pain may be less severe and poorly localized, and patients may present with subtle signs such as abdominal distension or occult gastrointestinal bleeding [6].

In addition to embolic causes, mesenteric ischemia can be worsened by systemic conditions that restrict blood flow, such as hemorrhage, hypovolaemia, shock, and low-output cardiac states.

Physical Examination

In the early stages of AMI, physical examination findings are often sparse. The patient will typically appear to be in severe pain without relief, and abdominal tenderness is common. Suspicion should be heightened in frail patients of advanced age who may lack sufficient abdominal musculature to produce guarding during the examination.

Patients may appear pale due to pain or anemia, but specific physical signs are limited in this condition. Diagnosis often relies on a combination of clinical history and thorough investigation.

AMI is a critical condition characterized by reduced blood flow to the intestines, leading to severe complications if not diagnosed early. The physical examination findings should be combined with clinical history and specific symptoms. Understanding these findings is essential for timely intervention.

Key Findings

  • Severe Abdominal Pain: Patients typically present with a sudden onset of severe abdominal pain, which is a hallmark symptom of AMI.
  • Painless Interval: Following the initial pain, a transient painless period may occur, potentially misleading the diagnosis.
  • Signs of Peritonitis: Physical examination may reveal tenderness, guarding, or rebound tenderness, indicating peritoneal irritation and necessitating immediate surgical evaluation.
  • Bowel Sounds: Diminished or absent bowel sounds can suggest intestinal ischemia.

Importance of Clinical History to Guide Physical Exam

  • Risk Factors: A thorough history should include predisposing factors such as cardiovascular disease, recent surgeries, or conditions leading to hypercoagulability.
  • Chronic Symptoms: In cases of arterial thrombosis, patients may report a history of intermittent abdominal pain, weight loss, or diarrhea.

Alternative Diagnoses

The nonspecific symptoms of AMI mean it can be mimicked by many other conditions that are not easily excluded based on history and examination alone. Risk factors such as advanced age, prothrombotic states, atherosclerosis, and conditions causing hypovolaemia should raise clinical suspicion.

Differential diagnoses include:

  • Acute gastroenteritis: Main differential due to similar gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, diarrhea, vomiting), especially at the initial stages of AMI, but pain and tenderness are typically less severe, more intermittent, and responsive to analgesia. Gastroenteritis is also less likely to cause metabolic acidosis or other significant biochemical abnormalities.
  • Acute cholecystitis: Presents with pain mainly in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) radiating to the right shoulder, often triggered by fatty meals, with accompanying nausea, vomiting, and fever. Murphy’s sign (pain and inspiratory arrest on palpation of the gallbladder) is often positive, particularly in those with a history of gallstones or biliary colic.
  • Acute pancreatitis: Epigastric pain radiating to the back, along with nausea and vomiting, is common. Associated with gallstones or alcohol use. Physical findings include epigastric tenderness, reduced bowel sounds, and, in severe cases, Grey-Turner’s or Cullen’s sign. Diagnosis is supported by elevated serum lipase or amylase levels.
  • Peptic ulcer disease: Characterized by burning or gnawing epigastric pain, often relieved by food or antacids. Common risk factors include NSAID use and Helicobacter pylori infection. Examination is typically unremarkable unless perforation occurs, which may result in acute peritonitis.
  • Bowel perforation: Sudden severe, diffuse abdominal pain with signs of peritonitis (rebound tenderness, guarding), fever, and tachycardia. A history of PUD or diverticulitis may be present. Diagnosis is supported by imaging, showing free air under the diaphragm on X-ray.
  • Diverticulitis: Presents with localized left lower quadrant (LLQ) pain, fever, and altered bowel habits (diarrhea or constipation). LLQ tenderness or a palpable mass is often noted in older patients.
  • Bowel obstruction: Crampy, intermittent abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, abdominal distension, and constipation, potentially progressing to obstipation. Examination reveals a distended abdomen with high-pitched or absent bowel sounds. Plain X-rays typically show air-fluid levels and dilated bowel loops.
  • Ureteric calculus: Sudden colicky flank pain radiating to the groin, often with hematuria, nausea, and vomiting. A history of kidney stones is common. Findings include costovertebral angle tenderness, with a generally unremarkable abdominal exam. Hematuria is detected on urinalysis.

Acing Diagnostic Testing

Bedside Tests

Bedside diagnostics are limited but can provide valuable clues:

  • ECG: May reveal atrial fibrillation, a common risk factor.
  • Blood glucose: Hyperglycaemia due to physiological stress.
  • Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) for lactate: Elevated levels may indicate tissue hypoxia, though not specific to AMI.
  • Ultrasound: Limited in diagnosing AMI but useful for ruling out other causes of abdominal pain (e.g., cholecystitis, abdominal aneurysm, or ureteric colic). Ultrasound can also assess fluid status and response to fluid resuscitation via the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right heart function, particularly in patients with cardiac or renal comorbidities or failure.
An ECG sample in an abdominal pain patient - Rapid ventricular rate, atrial fibrillation.

Laboratory Tests

No serum markers are sufficiently sensitive or specific to diagnose AMI reliably:

  • Complete blood count (CBC): It may reveal haemoconcentration or leukocytosis but lacks specificity.
  • Serum lactate: Highly sensitive in bowel infarction but nonspecific; elevated levels may not occur in the early stages.

Leucocytosis and elevated lactate levels are the two most frequently observed abnormalities in acute mesenteric ischemia; however, both lack specificity for this condition [7,8].

  • Blood gas analysis: Metabolic acidosis is a late finding; its presence should heighten suspicion in the appropriate clinical context.
  • Serum amylase: Moderately elevated in more than half of cases; highly elevated levels suggest pancreatitis, which should guide further diagnostic steps.

Imaging

  • X-rays (Chest/Abdomen): Chest and abdominal X-rays are often normal in the early stages of acute mesenteric ischemia but are useful for identifying complications or alternative diagnoses (e.g., perforation, ureteric calculus) [9]. Early findings may include adynamic ileus, distended air-filled bowel loops, or bowel wall thickening. Late findings such as pneumatosis or portal venous gas strongly suggest bowel infarction.
  • CT Scanning: The primary imaging modality in diagnosing AMI. When enhanced with contrast, CT can detect bowel wall edema, mesenteric edema, abnormal gas patterns, intramural gas, ascites, and mesenteric venous thrombosis. Sensitivity and specificity are high (82.8–97.6% and 91.2–98.2%, respectively), though contrast use may be limited by renal function [10]. However, delaying diagnosis poses greater risks than the small chance (~1%) of contrast-induced nephropathy requiring dialysis [11].
The CT image shows bowel wall thickness.
  • Catheter Angiography: is considered the gold standard but rarely available in emergency settings [10]. It may still be necessary if CT is inconclusive and clinical suspicion remains high.
  • Diagnostic Laparotomy: it may be required for definitive diagnosis in cases of high suspicion when imaging is non-diagnostic.

Risk Stratification

No validated tools exist for risk stratification in AMI. However, specific features indicate late-stage disease and worse prognosis:

  • Prolonged symptoms before presentation.
  • Evidence of bowel necrosis or perforation.
  • Severe biochemical derangements (e.g., high lactate, metabolic acidosis).
  • Hemodynamic instability, such as septic or hemorrhagic shock.

Management

Initial Stabilization

Initial stabilization of the patient, if required, is straightforward but must follow a systematic approach, following airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure.

Airway and Breathing:

The airway should be secured if necessary, especially in cases where the patient appears drowsy due to cerebral hypoperfusion or septic encephalopathy, or if they are actively vomiting and at high risk of aspiration. Rapid correction of hypovolaemia before administering sedatives or paralytics is recommended. Breathing is not commonly compromised in this condition; however, supplemental oxygen may be required for patients experiencing atelectasis or tachypnoea secondary to pain.

C: Circulation – Circulation management necessitates aggressive and rapid resuscitation with fluids or blood products. Fluid resuscitation should not be delayed due to difficulty in obtaining IV access. Ultrasound guidance can be used if venous access proves challenging. If the patient is hypotensive, an initial 10–20 mL/kg (Crystalloids: Normal saline / Hartmann’s / Ringer’s lactate / Plasmalyte etc.) bolus delivered rapidly over 5–15 minutes is appropriate. This usually requires at least one large-bore IV line (20G or larger).

Many of these patients have comorbidities such as congestive heart failure (CHF), which requires judicious fluid management. Careful hemodynamic monitoring, including repeated clinical assessments and sonographic evaluation of inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility, is crucial. If required, more invasive hemodynamic monitoring may be employed.

Vasoactive agents should be avoided due to their role as predisposing factors; however, if vasopressors are essential, it is advisable to avoid alpha-agonist medications.

D: Disability – In patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), mental status may become altered if ischemia progresses to sepsis or shock, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion. This may present as confusion, agitation, or lethargy. Tools such as the AVPU scale or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) are valuable for assessing consciousness and monitoring neurological status during treatment. Clinicians should also consider the presence of sequelae from prior strokes, as these may indicate underlying atherosclerotic disease, which is a risk factor for AMI. Additionally, severe pain can interfere with the patient’s ability to engage fully in the assessment, even when mental status remains intact.

E: Exposure – The patient should be fully exposed to enable a thorough examination, while ensuring measures are taken to maintain warmth and prevent hypothermia, as this can worsen shock. A systematic palpation of the abdomen is critical to identify tenderness, guarding, or masses. In the early stages of AMI, there may be no external signs, but central or generalized abdominal tenderness is typically present. As the condition advances, abdominal distension and signs of peritonitis, such as rebound tenderness and rigidity, may develop.

Clinicians should also observe for secondary indicators, including surgical scars or stomas, which may suggest a history of abdominal pathology. Systemic signs of hypoperfusion and shock, such as mottled skin or cool extremities, should also be noted. Regular and frequent reassessment is essential to detect any progression or subtle changes in the patient’s condition, ensuring timely and appropriate intervention.

Early and empirical administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is critical and should not be delayed for blood culture collection, as the risk of bacterial translocation across the bowel wall is high. Oral intake must be avoided since these patients are likely to undergo urgent surgery under general anesthesia. Electrolyte imbalances should also be corrected promptly.

Antibiotic Administration

Ceftriaxone

  • Dose per kg: 1–2 g
  • Frequency: Stat (given immediately)
  • Maximum Dose: 2 g
  • Category in Pregnancy: Category B (safe for all trimesters)
  • Cautions/Comments: None specified.

Metronidazole

  • Dose per kg: 500 mg
  • Frequency: Stat (given immediately)
  • Maximum Dose: 500 mg
  • Category in Pregnancy: Category B (safe for all trimesters)
  • Cautions/Comments: None specified.

An urgent surgical consultation is imperative, as acute mesenteric ischemia is a time-sensitive condition. Delays to definitive treatment significantly increase morbidity and mortality. High clinical suspicion alone should prompt surgical involvement, even before imaging results are available. In critically ill patients, surgical teams may decide to proceed directly to the operating theatre without advanced imaging. Such decisions are typically made collaboratively by the emergency department, surgical, anesthetic, and intensive care teams.

The definitive treatment for acute mesenteric ischemia depends on the underlying cause and whether necrotic bowel is present. Necrotic bowel or signs of peritonitis necessitate immediate resection. Specific interventions include embolectomy with distal bypass grafting for mesenteric artery embolism, bypass grafting or stenting for mesenteric artery thrombosis, and removal of underlying stimuli in nonocclusive ischemia, sometimes supplemented with direct transcatheter papaverine infusion. Mesenteric venous thrombosis typically requires anticoagulation [7].

Special Patient Groups

Special populations, such as those with communication barriers or cognitive impairments, may require a lower threshold for advanced imaging since history-taking and physical examination may be unreliable. Pregnant and pediatric patients are rarely affected by this condition.

When To Admit This Patient

Given the critical nature of acute mesenteric ischemia and its high mortality rates, all affected patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit for postoperative management following surgery.

Revisiting Your Patient

Our patient was triaged to a high-acuity area of the emergency department (ED) and placed on continuous monitoring, including cardiac leads, blood pressure, and oximetry. Stabilization proceeded in a structured, prioritized manner, focusing on critical areas from A to E:

  • Airway and Breathing: The patient’s airway was intact, and there were no signs of active vomiting. Mild dyspnoea was reported, so supplemental oxygen was administered via nasal cannula.
  • Circulation: Two large-bore intravenous cannulae were inserted, and a liter of crystalloids was infused. This led to visible hemodynamic improvement, including better IVC collapsibility observed on ultrasound.
  • Disability and Exposure: Disability and exposure did not reveal anything abnormal except for a generalized tenderness on the abdomen.

With the patient stabilized, the team moved on to investigations. Blood samples were taken, including a point-of-care venous gas test with serum lactate, coagulation profile, and a group and cross-match. Leucocytes were elevated at 12,000, and serum lactate was elevated at 8. Cardiac monitoring revealed atrial fibrillation. Bedside ultrasound did not reveal other causes of abdominal pain, such as a ruptured aneurysm or cholecystitis. Chest and abdominal X-rays were normal.

Based on the clinical presentation, risk factors, and lab results, the treating team suspected acute mesenteric ischemia. A surgical consult was requested, and a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was ordered. Maintenance IV crystalloids and broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone and metronidazole) were started empirically. A urinary catheter was placed to monitor fluid balance.

The CT scan revealed:

  • A thickened small bowel wall with dilated bowel loops
  • An embolism in the superior mesenteric artery

The patient was immediately taken to the operating theatre for definitive treatment.

In summary, the role of the ED physician is to:

  1. Stabilize the patient through targeted resuscitation
  2. Make an early diagnosis based on clinical suspicion supported by available investigations
  3. Understand the limitations of laboratory tests in ruling out acute mesenteric ischemia
  4. Prioritize aggressive resuscitation and management
  5. Ensure urgent surgical involvement

Authors

Picture of Colin NG

Colin NG

Woodlands Health

Listen to the chapter

References

  1. Tendler DA, Lamont JT. Overview of intestinal ischemia in adults. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-intestinal-ischemia-in-adults Updated January 29, 2024. Accessed December 9, 2024.
  2. McKinsey JF, Gewertz BL. Acute mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(2):307-318.
  3. Oldenburg WA, Lau LL, Rodenberg TJ, Edmonds HJ, Burger CD. Acute mesenteric ischemia: a clinical review. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1054-1062.
  4. Szuba A, Gosk-Bierska I, Hallett RL. Thromboembolism. In: Rubin GD, Rofsky NM, ed. CT and MR Angiography: Comprehensive Vascular Assessment. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 295-328.
  5. Marc Christopher Winslet. Intestinal Obstruction. In: R.C.G. Russell ed. Bailey & Love’s Short Practice Of Surgery 24th ed. London, UK: Arnold; 2004:1202.
  6. Tendler DA, Lamont JT. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/nonocclusive-mesenteric-ischemia Updated December 13, 2023. Accessed December 9, 2024.
  7. Park WM, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, et al. Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Factors associated with survival. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(3):445-452.
  8. Cudnik MT, Darbha S, Jones J, Macedo J, Stockton SW, Hiestand BC. The diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(11):1087-1100.
  9. Smerud MJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH. Diagnosis of bowel infarction: a comparison of plain films and CT scans in 23 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(1):99-103.
  10. Menke J. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2010;256(1):93-101.
  11. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1393-1399.

FOAM and Further Reading

CDEM Curriculum – Patel S, Mesenteric Ischemia – June 2018, https://cdemcurriculum.com/mesenteric-ischemia/ Accessed May 2023

EMdocs – Seth Lotterman. Mesenteric Ischemia: A Power Review. Nov 2014. http://www.emdocs.net/mesenteric-ischemia-power-review/ Accessed May 2023

Reviewed and Edited By

Picture of Elif Dilek Cakal, MD, MMed

Elif Dilek Cakal, MD, MMed

Picture of Arif Alper Cevik, MD, FEMAT, FIFEM

Arif Alper Cevik, MD, FEMAT, FIFEM

Prof Cevik is an Emergency Medicine academician at United Arab Emirates University, interested in international emergency medicine, emergency medicine education, medical education, point of care ultrasound and trauma. He is the founder and director of the International Emergency Medicine Education Project – iem-student.org, chair of the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) core curriculum and education committee and board member of the Asian Society for Emergency Medicine and Emirati Board of Emergency Medicine.

Question Of The Day #31

question of the day
qod31
CT bowel wall thickness - m

Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis causing this patient’s symptoms?

This elderly female patient presents to the emergency department with acute onset of severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. Compared to younger patients, abdominal pain in an elderly patient has a higher likelihood of being due to a surgical emergency or from a diagnosis that carries a higher mortality. Elderly patients may have more nonspecific associated symptoms that may make it difficult to confirm a dangerous diagnosis without advanced imaging.  Additionally, elderly patients do not always have a fever or elevated white blood cells during an abdominal infection.  The differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in an elderly patient should be broad and encompass conditions related to many body systems.

The patient in this question has pain that is reported as being significantly high in relation to the minimal amount of abdominal tenderness provoked by the physical exam. This finding, known as “pain out of proportion” should raise concern for an ischemic etiology of the patient’s pain.  Ruptured appendicitis (Choice A) is less likely as the patient lacks clinical signs of peritonitis (i.e. diffuse tenderness with guarding, fever, hypotension, signs of shock).  Appendicitis, although not impossible in an elderly individual, is a diagnosis that occurs more often in younger patients. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (Choice B) typically results in death rapidly from hemorrhagic shock. This patient lacks signs of shock (hypotension, tachycardia, altered mental status), and her aorta on CT scan is not enlarged or aneurysmal (see image below).  Ureterolithiasis (Choice D), or a stone in the ureter, typically manifests as unilateral intermittent flank pain with hematuria. The question stem does not report a history of prior stones, and a first-time stone at an elderly age is not likely. 

Given the patent’s advanced age, her “pain out of proportion”, acute onset, risk factors for thromboembolic disease (Atrial fibrillation), the most likely diagnosis is acute mesenteric ischemia (Choice C). X-ray imaging can be used prior to CT angiogram imaging, but CT imaging is more specific and sensitive in making the diagnosis.  X-ray imaging may show bowel dilation, ileus, or pneumatosis intestinalis (air in bowel wall) in severe cases.  Lactate and D-Dimer testing can be used in the evaluation of these patients, but neither test is specific for mesenteric ischemia and reliable enough to rule out the disease. CT angiogram imaging of the abdomen and pelvis is the gold-standard diagnostic test for mesenteric ischemia.  Early CT findings include bowel wall thickening (seen on this patient’s imaging), dilated bowel, mesenteric edema, or ascites. Late CT findings include pneumoperitoneum, portal venous gas, and pneumatosis intestinalis.  Treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia is fluid resuscitation, broad spectrum antibiotics, surgical consultation, and consideration for anticoagulation.

References

[cite]

Selected Gastrointestinal Emergencies

Gastrointestinal Emergencies selected from SAEM and IFEM undergraduate curriculum recommendations are uploaded into the website. You can read, listen or download all these chapters freely. More specific disease entities are on the way.

Acute Appendicitis

by Ozlem Dikme Introduction About 7% of the population develops appendicitis in their lives. Males are affected 1.4 times higher than females, and teenagers more

Read More »

Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

by Rabind Antony Charles Case Presentation A 75-year-old woman presents to your Emergency Department (ED) with diffuse abdominal pain for the past day, associated with

Read More »

Biliary Disease

by Dan O’Brien Introduction The biliary system can be defined as the organs and ducts that create, transport and store bile and eventually release it

Read More »

Massive Gastrointestinal Bleeding

by Dan O’Brien Introduction Despite advances in diagnosis prevention and treatment, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is still a serious problem in clinical practice. The incidence

Read More »

Perforated Viscus

by Ozlem Dikme – Turkey Case Presentation A previously healthy 42-year-old male presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a 3-day history of worsening abdominal

Read More »

Do you need more?

Elderly With Abdominal Pain!

Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

Rabind Antony Charles, Singapore

A 75-year-old woman presents to your Emergency Department (ED) with diffuse abdominal pain for the past day, associated with diarrhea and vomiting. She says the pain is increasingly worse and has failed to respond to paracetamol and charcoal tablets. She has a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and atrial fibrillation. She has no history of laparotomy. She is alert and oriented. However, she is in distress because of her abdominal pain. The pain score is 9 out of 10. Blood pressure: 96 over 56 mmHg, pulse rate: 125 (irregularly, irregular), respiratory rate 20, pulse oximetry: 98% on room air, tympanic temperature: 37.5 degrees Celsius. Heart sounds: (irregular) S1S2 positive. Lungs sounds are bilateral equal and clear. Abdominal exam reveals diffuse tenderness; it is worse in periumbilical region, no guarding, bowel sounds are sluggish. No scars or hernias noted. Per rectal exam: brown stool. ECG is given on the side.

Rabind Antony Charles

What is the mortality risk?

Touch Me

Mortality

rates can be between 60-80% especially in patients with greater than a 24-hour delay in diagnosis or presentation
Answer